Right now, the JMStV, a law that should prevail in the (German) Internet tighter age restrictions on the Internet debate. Notably from the point that there may be (which will be judged quite differently from Jurist_innen) endangers freedom of expression on the net, as it set the Betreiber_innen of blogs as a warning to an incalculable risk, risked significant fines, should as the self-assessment of content do not meet any official standards. I would like at this point on their way, this has been said elsewhere a lot.
As for me, but in addition to the threat of my freedom of expression, as could the whole child protection history, even annoying is how people are defined by the law as teenagers or children, will be covered: How a vegetable that in order for the ideal image of our state to grow, even properly cast, cut back and only occasionally is not to be doused with too much crap. As a pure state, and patient educational training efforts. So it seems, a hundred years after Freud, nor always give a kind of idea that children come as somehow pure essence of the world who would not by itself sexual aggression, enjoyment of the representation of violence or interests. The fact that these things are possible, but stay away from them and taboo needs to grow up the little angel breasts and beards, and then they are themselves old and vicious. That the development of a human being but never just a result Erziehungsbemühung (which exist as such only recently), but always also the result of their own self-activity is, in this view as not available.
Especially with regard sexual content I've still never even the hint of a scientific justification read it, deny such content young people. Of course one could argue that mediate sexual practices depicted in pornography as sexist ideas, but then the selection is not as yes. Finally, apply to feminist porn as well as any other release criteria. Instead, children should be taught by venerable Biologielehrer_innen that the penis penetrates the vagina because you so very fond of her or something. Next hour, then dissected frog legs. That you can not even have a relationship to be good sex, and even all by yourself, find the fact so sooner or later all out anyway. Naturally coy about indications, Behind the house at night to do something in the consciousness of dirty, unnatural, because otherwise there would be nothing to hide. And so the sexual morality is in the next round, as soon as become of the young people themselves adults with children, where sexual interests of children (or sexually interested in children) as disgusting and unnatural to see them because them their own desire was taught as a child as such. Please forgive my amateur psychology, but in fact I think the youth protection is a tool of a pathological society to be against their children, who you know, to say nothing in it.
The only good news is probably that the networks that we have made as children, probably difficult to crack, as long as it is not possible the educational supervision with their thumb screws and blinders on all day to extend. And as long as these networks exist, young people will continue to have opportunities to objects of their interest - whether information, media, computer games, drugs, or experience - to go. This is also a form of class struggle. The JMStV in this respect is another attack on the curiosity and spontaneity of young people. But that seems to interest nobody, not even among liberals. But we are no longer children ...
0 comments:
Post a Comment